(1) In a recent blog post (Cox, 2015), your instructor wrote a short essay describing a situation in which dissemination of research results could have posed a danger to the public. As noted in this essay, how does D. Relman (2014) think we should handle these situations? Do you agree with Relman that guidance on the issue should include the views of non-scientist members of the public? Why or why not?
Please provide references and 120 words. Thanks in advance.