organisational behaviour and global strategy

ASSESSMENT DETAILSIndividual Portfolio (3000 words)1-  Identify a multi-national organization. Critically analyse the strategy of the organization utilizing the range of strategy content. Please also identify the competitive advantage of your selected organisation.2-  Identify a significant event, challenge, transformation or merger/acquisition that affected the organization. Please make sure you take into consideration the current pandemic and other contemporary drivers of change.3-  Analyse how the challenge was managed by the organization, with a focus on leadership, culture, and the human relations aspects of the context.4-  Discuss how the organization’s strategy impacted the management of the challenge. Furthermore, critically discuss the impact of the challenge on the organization’s strategy.Additional information on the assessment:You are encouraged to search for potential organizations early and ensure that you have access to adequate data sources for completing your report, before you finalize your choice.This assessment will be graded using the following criteria:(i) Critical analysis of the strategy of the organization, applying theories and conceptual frameworks covered in the module (30%)(ii)  Critical application of leadership and management of change models/theories to analyze the context in question (30%)(iii)  Discussion and synthesis of the strategy and change aspects of the selected challenge; evidence of wider reading critically applied in your analyses (30%)(iv)  Presentation, structure, grammar and referencing (10%)The following Learning Outcomes are demonstrated via this assessment Knowledge1. Discuss the nature and roots of competitive advantage2. Critically discuss the dilemmas inherent in integrating ethics and social responsibility into organisational strategy3. Critically evaluate different models/theories and perspectives on leadership and the management of change4. Discuss the dilemmas inherent in strategy development and change management Thinking skills5. Appraise the strategic situation of a business or business unit on the basis of complex, incomplete and ambiguous information Subject-based practical skills6. Determine the appropriate leadership and change management approach for a particular organisational context7. Appraise strategic proposals and develop contextually appropriate alternatives Skills for life and work (general skills)8. Communicate effectively on strategy, leadership and change management to both expert and non-expert audiencesAssessment CriteriaGENERIC Command of the Subject DESCRIPTORSSubject Specific Skills Scholarly and& Practices Professional Skills &Attributes90-100%Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is excellent and informed by the highest level of scholarship Excellent integration of the full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesGoes beyond the material displaying exceptional flair in tackling issues identifiedExceptional application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes Exceptional professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional norms-Work that influences how academics and students think about their discipline through: being original within the discipline; achieving the highest level of compelling, coherent and concise argument attainable within the level ofstudy; using a full range of high quality sources to inform but not dominate the argument80-89%Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive, accurate, relevant and informed by advanced scholarship Excellent integration of the full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesGoes beyond the material with excellent conceptualization which is original, innovative and/or insightfulExcellent and original application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve the learning outcomes Excellent professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional normsWork that has real potential to influence how academics and students may think about the discipline through: being original on the basis of its excellence in the context of the level of study; a compelling, coherent and concise argument; drawing on a full range of high quality sources70-79%Informed by a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive, accurate, relevant with awareness of advanced scholarshipVery good integration of a full range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesGoes beyond the material with very good conceptualization, which is often original, innovative and/or insightfulConstantly applies theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes with some originalityVery good professional presentation using an appropriate range of resources and reflecting professional normsWork that has some potential to influence how academics and students may think about the discipline through: some originality on the basis of its excellence in the context of the level of study; arguments which are coherent, concise, and frequently compelling; drawing on a wide range of high quality sources60-69%Demonstrates a breadth and depth of substantive knowledge that is comprehensive and accurate Good integration of a range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesSome good insight into the materialClear evidence of the application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes with few obvious flaws Professional presentation using a good range of resources and reflecting professional normsWork that critically engages with current thinking in the discipline through: clear differentiation between the quality and appropriateness of the sources used; arguments which are coherent and concise and offer robust conclusions; the development of a good analytical model50-59%Demonstrates an adequate breadth and depth of substantive knowledge but with only a few errors or omissionsDemonstrates an adequate understanding of a range of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesShows some ability to critically engage with the materialAdequate application of theoretical and technical knowledge to achieve learning outcomes although with some obvious flawsPresentation which adequately reflects relevant professional normsWork that accurately reports on current thinking in the discipline through: the repetition of, rather critical engagement with, limited sources; adequate differentiation between the quality and appropriateness of sources used; drawing adequate conclusions which do not always fully reflect the complexity of the subject matter; an adequate if unsophisticated analytical model40-49%Incomplete breadth and depth of substantive knowledge with some errors or omissionsDemonstrates limited ability to put theory into practice Demonstrates an awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesLimited and underdeveloped critical engagement with the materialWork that offers a limited understanding of thinking in the discipline through: limited attention – Demonstrates limited technical ability but lacking theoretical and reflective insights Presentation which reflects professional practice in a limited manner30-39%Little relevant knowledge which is minimal in its breadth and depth with major errors or omissions Minimal awareness of the appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesFails to demonstrate sufficient critical engagement with the materialDemonstrates a minimal ability to meet learning outcomes in the grasp of both theory and technical knowledge Presentation which displays little more than cursory attention to professional normsWork that often misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: minimal attention paid to the quality, range and appropriateness of sources used; poorly informed opinion led work with a minimal evidence base; no real underlyingstructure of argument; work that is frequently confused and incoherent20-29%Does not demonstrate even a basic understanding of the subject matterInsufficient awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesLittle evidence of critical engagement with the materialLacks any real application of skills to meet learning outcomesFails to demonstrate any substantive meeting of learning outcomesNo real attention to the disciplinary norms of presentationWork that fundamentally misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: a lack of attention to the quality, range and appropriateness of sources used; poorly informed opinion-led work rather than evidence based argument; no real underlying structure of argument10-19%Demonstrates confusion over the subject matterLittle awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesNo evidence of critical engagement with the materialFails to demonstrate the use of skills to meet learning outcomesFails to demonstrate any substantive meeting of learning outcomesNo real attention to the disciplinary norms of presentationWork that completely misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: inadequacy of sources used; unsubstantial assertion with no evidence base; failure to structure the argument being presented0-9%Demonstrates mainly ignorance of the subject matter by presenting information of minimal relevanceLittle or no awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniquesLearning outcomes are not metNo real attention to any norms of presentationWork that completely misrepresents or misunderstands thinking in the discipline through: absence or misuse of sources; work that is confused and incoherentGeneral Advice Submitting your workWe strongly suggest that you try to submit all coursework by the deadline set as meeting deadlines will be expected in employment. However, in our regulations, UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. Coursework which is submitted late, but within 24 hours of the deadline, will be assessed but subjected to a fixed penalty of 5% of the total marks available (as opposed to marks obtained). If you submit twice, once before the deadline and once during the 24 hour late period, then the second submission will be marked and 5% deducted. This rule only applies to coursework. It does not apply to examinations, presentations, performances, practical assessments or viva voce examinations. If you miss these for a genuine reason, then you will need to apply for extenuating circumstances, or accept that you will receive a zero mark. Further information is available in the Assessment & Feedback Policy at https://www.uel.ac.uk/Discover/Governance/Policies- RegulationsCorporate-documents/Student-PoliciesGuidance on referencingCite Them Right is the standard Harvard referencing style at UEL for all Schools. Cite Them Right is a comprehensive guide that will teach you all you need to know about Harvard referencing, plagiarism and collusion. The electronic version of “Cite Them Right: the essential referencing guide” 9th edition, can be accessed whilst on or off campus, via UEL Direct. The book can only be read online and no part of it can be printed nor downloaded. Further information is available athttps://uelac.sharepoint.com/LibraryandLearningServices/Pages/defa ult.aspxTurnitin System Failure Best advice: Don’t wait until the last minute to submit your assessments electronically. If you experience a problem submitting your work with Turnitin, you should notify your lecturer/tutor by email immediately. However, deadlines are not extended unless there is a significant systems problem with Turnitin. UEL has specific plans in place to address these issues. If UEL finds that the issue with the system was significant, you will receive an email notifying you of the issue and that you have been given a 24 hour extension. If you don’t receive any email that specifically states you have been given an extension, then the original deadline has not been changed.PresentationYour work should be word processed in accordance with the following: • Font size 12 Arial or Times New Roman• 1.15 line spacing.• Pages should be numbered• Your name or student number should not appear anywhere onthe script.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.